Ｏ[The third round] (Comprehend the first law of thermodynamics as: Finite energy can do infinite work!)First Part

▽The third round: Tiny particles as the cons went to the office of Mr. First law of thermodynamics as the pros▼

▽The pros:▼Do you know what is the first law of thermodynamics? I＊d like to readout this law before discussing the questions: The first law of thermodynamics is one of the basic laws in thermodynamics. We apply theory of energy conservation and transformation into thermodynamics and make an empirical conclusion that all kinds of energy transform between each other but keep a fixed total value. It can be stated as: Heat quantity that the external environment transmits to a mass system equals to the sum of the system＊s internal energy increment and the work it doing to outside. Sometimes it can also be stated as: The first category perpetual motion machine can＊t be made.
▽The cons:▼Thank you for your reading out. But I still want to discuss related questions with you on the basis of Brownian perpetual motion machine.
▽The pros:▼Ok! So do you think in the procedure of energy transformation the sum of all kinds of energy is fixed?
▽The cons:▼I praise the art of making articles, for it shows the perfection of our nature. If all energy keeps consuming, the nature must go to death. If energy keeps increasing and accumulating, it must lead to a whole cosmic [volcano explosion].
▽The pros:▼But would not your continuously working perpetual motion machine lead to a whole cosmic [volcano explosion]?
▽The cons:▼Thank you for your correct understanding of one of my viewpoints. The Brownian perpetual motion machine I mean really continues to do work but not to create energy. As for this point, I＊d like to ask a simple question: how much work could one joule energy do?
▽The pros:▼In an ideal state, one joule energy can do one joule work. But there＊s no ideal state existing in the nature. Thus, one joule energy can do about 0.9 joule work (less than one joule) under the best condition.
▽The cons:▼Undoubtedly, your answer is very precise according to the current scientific theory. But please allow to argue that one joule energy can once do one joule work in the nature (including idle work).
▽The pros:▼(Interrupting the cons)There is a sudden appearance of the word ※once§ in your statement. It＊s a strange statement. Much odd falsehood starts from a tiny difference but leads to a big false at last. Do you mean that one joule energy can do one joule work and even more? I need the testifying experiment.
▽The cons:▼Firstly let us look at the following phenomenon. Five balls on the billiards table arranged in one line with an equal distance between each other (supposed to be under the ideal condition). After one hitting of one joule energy on the first ball in the linear direction by a cue, the first ball had a head-on collision with the second ball. When the first ball stops, the second ball gets one joule energy of motion. That is the first ball do one joule effective work to the second one. The rest may be deduced by analogy. After four times of collision, the total work done is four joules. Mechanical efficiency: 灰=4 joules work output¯1 joule input=400%. If considering such factors as air friction and so on, the mechanical efficiency could reach 300% (It＊s calculated by supposing an efficient work of 90% for each collision).
▽The pros:▼It is really miraculous!
▽The cons:▼If one idea has been testified, people will accept it. That is [The false is easy to be eliminated while the true is hard to disappear]. Because most people are used to considering one work-doing as the whole, your answer is beyond question. But in fact, this one joule has already existed in universe for a long time and has done work for heaps of times. The time you found it did about 0.9 joule work is just an instant of its long work-doing history. There＊ll be countless opportunities for it to do work later.
▽The pros:▼Is there any relation between Brownian perpetual motion machine and what you have said?
▽The cons:▼In Brownian perpetual motion machine, the opportunities water molecules do work to Brownian particles are not once or four times but uncountable. So we can know a good many situations through one example, the profoundness revealed by Brownian perpetual motion machine is very subtle and colorful. It can be said that any kind of energy in the nature can do work for heaps of times. That is ▽doing work infinitely by an finite energy!▼ It＊s this very fact that makes the Nature perpetual motion machine run continuously not to death or to explosion.
▽The pros:▼It seems that your parlance does not violate the rule that the total energy value keeps fixed in the procedure of transformation between different kinds of energy. You must mean that the total energy value of the whole universe is unchangeable but the work it has done could increase infinitely.
▽The cons:▼Oh, what I said ▽doing work infinitely by an finite energy!▼just now is like an advertisement. Your generalization contains high scientific and technological conception. Thank you!
▽The pros:▼But that is not the end for our discussion. Here I＊d like to explain that all my disagreement with the current theories starts from their conflicts with the phenomenon of perpetual motion machine. I＊d like to talk over it next time. See you later!
......
......