amphlianthus
26 Nov 2005, 17:00
八月份刚从国内回来,因为需要搬家到另一个城市,就自己租了辆车.一个星期天早上开车搬家的时候因为路上车不多,所以有点走神,没注意限速标志,在SPEED LIMIT 40的地方开到 56(还以为自己仍在60MPH的限速下) 被警察抓到.
我拿的是国内驾照,来英国也超过一年了, 我每年都回国(在被抓之前几天才刚入境).我跟警察说明了情况,并把护照也出示给他证明,警察拿着我的驾照和护照回警车里查了半天,回来对我说"your licence is alright"当时我心里没底就又问了一遍我驾照有没有问题,他又很肯定的说没有,但因为我拿的不是英国驾照,所以不能给我罚单,要我回去等法院的SUMMONS.
一直等到今天,收到法院的SUMMONS,SUMMONS上只有超速的OFFENCE,没有提驾照的问题,但要我带着驾照上庭...
但我一直担心开庭时COURT会不会再提我国内驾照的问题,另外如果我PLEA GUILTY的话,是可以不去上庭在家等结果的,这个CASE没什么好说的,我肯定是PLEA GUILTY的,这样我是上庭好还是不上庭好?另外,我需要见见律师吗?是自己找还是去见法院的当值律师?大家谁有这方面的经验请给我点建议,谢谢!
我知道这一切都是我的不对,以后一定不会犯了,大家口下留情啊...
greenpepper2
26 Nov 2005, 17:31
you are lucky... i suggest you plea guilt by letter. It would get much complicated if you go in person.
I think you will be fine this time.
那个警察业务不熟练,你驾照过期的事情就拉倒了,超速是没跑的。选择不去法庭而书面认罪,一般就是罚款,但是可能是算一个小的conviction,将来在英国还是有点小后果的。
找律师也是我们这样的建议,你有找律师的钱就给这个论坛公益捐点吧。
amphlianthus
27 Nov 2005, 0:31
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 26 Nov 2005, 20:19) |
那个警察业务不熟练,你驾照过期的事情就拉倒了,超速是没跑的。选择不去法庭而书面认罪,一般就是罚款,但是可能是算一个小的conviction,将来在英国还是有点小后果的。
找律师也是我们这样的建议,你有找律师的钱就给这个论坛公益捐点吧。 |
哦, 这样啊,那是不是以后换签什么的就要填上了.上庭和不上庭的处罚结果会不会不一样?
bluenight
27 Nov 2005, 13:57
中国驾照已经过期了,英国这些警察很多都不清楚 国外驾照的规定。。。
只能使用一年 从你第一次入境时算起,不过碰到不清楚的警察算你运气好
上庭就上被,不至于有什么大问题吧,每天超速的人多了 ,上庭只是让你交钱,如果你用英国驾照就不用上庭了,又不是出事故,又不是没保险。。。。。。。。。。。。
| QUOTE (bluenight @ 27 Nov 2005, 13:57) |
中国驾照已经过期了,英国这些警察很多都不清楚 国外驾照的规定。。。
只能使用一年 从你第一次入境时算起,不过碰到不清楚的警察算你运气好
上庭就上被,不至于有什么大问题吧,每天超速的人多了 ,上庭只是让你交钱,如果你用英国驾照就不用上庭了,又不是出事故,又不是没保险。。。。。。。。。。。。 |
一旦被法院判罚,尽管只是罚款,都应该算是conviction。而由警察处理的扣分和罚款是不算conviction的。
被法院转换,如果选择认罪,你去还是不去法庭都是一回事。除非你不认罪,到法院上让法官相信你没有错,这样你才是清白的。
amphlianthus
27 Nov 2005, 15:13
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:03) |
| QUOTE (bluenight @ 27 Nov 2005, 13:57) | 中国驾照已经过期了,英国这些警察很多都不清楚 国外驾照的规定。。。
只能使用一年 从你第一次入境时算起,不过碰到不清楚的警察算你运气好
上庭就上被,不至于有什么大问题吧,每天超速的人多了 ,上庭只是让你交钱,如果你用英国驾照就不用上庭了,又不是出事故,又不是没保险。。。。。。。。。。。。 |
一旦被法院判罚,尽管只是罚款,都应该算是conviction。而由警察处理的扣分和罚款是不算conviction的。
被法院转换,如果选择认罪,你去还是不去法庭都是一回事。除非你不认罪,到法院上让法官相信你没有错,这样你才是清白的。
|
哦,多谢了.那这个conviction会不会对签证有影响啊? 很严重吗?
如果到庭时态度比较好会不会被罚的轻一点?
| QUOTE (amphlianthus @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:13) |
哦,多谢了.那这个conviction会不会对签证有影响啊? 很严重吗? 如果到庭时态度比较好会不会被罚的轻一点? |
超速一次应该不影响签证。我没有准确根据,是我猜的。
法庭上认罪态度好坏就是多罚少罚点。关键是conviction,只有两种状态:有,还是没有。
greenpepper2
27 Nov 2005, 15:37
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:16) |
| QUOTE (amphlianthus @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:13) | 哦,多谢了.那这个conviction会不会对签证有影响啊? 很严重吗? 如果到庭时态度比较好会不会被罚的轻一点? |
超速一次应该不影响签证。我没有准确根据,是我猜的。
法庭上认罪态度好坏就是多罚少罚点。关键是conviction,只有两种状态:有,还是没有。
|
It's of course depended on how much you speeded, but normally NO conviction for a speeding, even if the case goes thru court.
You will be 100+ quids out of pocket, other than that, you are okay.
Consider urself really really lucky this time.
If you watched ROAD WAR yesterday nite on sky one, a guy were banned half year and some extra only coz he's clocked 105 mph on M25. So speeding's not as serious as NO insurance/license, but don't get carried away. You will be convicted if you think you can drive as you are racing in F1 circuit.
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:37) |
It's of course depended on how much you speeded, but normally NO conviction for a speeding, even if the case goes thru court. |
你的理解可能也对。
我先前认为经过法院判过的speeding也是一个conviction,尽管只是罚款。
也就是说,你我认定conviction界限是不同的。我认为法院判的都是convictions,警察处理的都不是convictions,不知道我的理解对不对?
你如果认为我的convictions理解不对,希望能给我找出书面根据。
greenpepper2
27 Nov 2005, 16:32
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 16:02) |
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:37) | It's of course depended on how much you speeded, but normally NO conviction for a speeding, even if the case goes thru court. |
你的理解可能也对。
我先前认为经过法院判过的speeding也是一个conviction,尽管只是罚款。
也就是说,你我认定conviction界限是不同的。我认为法院判的都是convictions,警察处理的都不是convictions,不知道我的理解对不对?
你如果认为我的convictions理解不对,希望能给我找出书面根据。
|
that's my experience... i called on behalf of a friend after she was fined 115 quid coz of a speeding. I was told this's just a way to handle the situation due to the chinese license she held, but this is not a conviction.
I think there are a lot of financial dispute which need to be sorted on civil court. So it's not possible everything goes thru court is defined as sort of conviction.
Or possibly there's a difference between criminal conviction and traffic conviction? Or difference between endorsed conviction and conviction just coz you are guilty on court. Any lawyer/solicitor here?
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 16:32) |
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 16:02) | | QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:37) | It's of course depended on how much you speeded, but normally NO conviction for a speeding, even if the case goes thru court. |
你的理解可能也对。
我先前认为经过法院判过的speeding也是一个conviction,尽管只是罚款。
也就是说,你我认定conviction界限是不同的。我认为法院判的都是convictions,警察处理的都不是convictions,不知道我的理解对不对?
你如果认为我的convictions理解不对,希望能给我找出书面根据。
|
that's my experience... i called on behalf of a friend after she was fined 115 quid coz of a speeding. I was told this's just a way to handle the situation due to the chinese license she held, but this is not a conviction.
I think there are a lot of financial dispute which need to be sorted on civil court. So it's not possible everything goes thru court is defined as sort of conviction.
Or possibly there's a difference between criminal conviction and traffic conviction? Or difference between endorsed conviction and conviction just coz you are guilty on court. Any lawyer/solicitor here?
|
6.1 Do you have any criminal convictions in the UK or any other country (including traffic offences) or any civil judgements made against you?
这是我在今年9月15日以后申请PR的表格上copied。其它的表格我没有好好看,这条要求应该是一样的。
我从这段话的理解是经过法院判决的超速、无保险、无驾照等traffic offences也算是criminal convictions.
我的另一个理解是经过警察处理而没有到法院的扣分和罚款不算criminal convictions.
你说呐?
greenpepper2
27 Nov 2005, 17:18
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 16:54) |
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 16:32) | | QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 16:02) | | QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 15:37) | It's of course depended on how much you speeded, but normally NO conviction for a speeding, even if the case goes thru court. |
你的理解可能也对。
我先前认为经过法院判过的speeding也是一个conviction,尽管只是罚款。
也就是说,你我认定conviction界限是不同的。我认为法院判的都是convictions,警察处理的都不是convictions,不知道我的理解对不对?
你如果认为我的convictions理解不对,希望能给我找出书面根据。
|
that's my experience... i called on behalf of a friend after she was fined 115 quid coz of a speeding. I was told this's just a way to handle the situation due to the chinese license she held, but this is not a conviction.
I think there are a lot of financial dispute which need to be sorted on civil court. So it's not possible everything goes thru court is defined as sort of conviction.
Or possibly there's a difference between criminal conviction and traffic conviction? Or difference between endorsed conviction and conviction just coz you are guilty on court. Any lawyer/solicitor here?
|
6.1 Do you have any criminal convictions in the UK or any other country (including traffic offences) or any civil judgements made against you?
这是我在今年9月15日以后申请PR的表格上copied。其它的表格我没有好好看,这条要求应该是一样的。
我从这段话的理解是经过法院判决的超速、无保险、无驾照等traffic offences也算是criminal convictions.
我的另一个理解是经过警察处理而没有到法院的扣分和罚款不算criminal convictions.
你说呐?
|
according to PR form, i think even if you take the conditional offer and settled the speeding outside of a court, it's still a traffic OFFENCE and you should still report it on form. It doen't matter exactly how CONCIVTION means.
And i couldnot see any difference between settling in and outside of a courts for the exact same thing in terms of granting a PR.
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:18) |
according to PR form, i think even if you take the conditional offer and settled the speeding outside of a court, it's still a traffic OFFENCE and you should still report it on form. It doen't matter exactly how CONCIVTION means.
And i couldnot see any difference between settling in and outside of a courts for the exact same thing in terms of granting a PR. |
我想问问你的明确理解,请回答Yes or No please.
1. 通过法院被认定的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
2. 通过警察处理的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
greenpepper2
27 Nov 2005, 17:35
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:24) |
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:18) | according to PR form, i think even if you take the conditional offer and settled the speeding outside of a court, it's still a traffic OFFENCE and you should still report it on form. It doen't matter exactly how CONCIVTION means.
And i couldnot see any difference between settling in and outside of a courts for the exact same thing in terms of granting a PR. |
我想问问你的明确理解,请回答Yes or No please.
1. 通过法院被认定的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
2. 通过警察处理的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
|
>>6.1 Do you have any criminal convictions in the UK or any other country
>>(including traffic offences) or any civil judgements made against you?
my point's that conviction or not doen't matter if PR application/visa extension's your only concern. You need to put those down on the form anyway regardless it's an offence or a conviction. And i cannot see any difference they handle it.
Abt your question, my ans's NO for both simply coz I WAS TOLD SO by traffic court of manchester magistrate court.
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:35) |
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:24) | | QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:18) | according to PR form, i think even if you take the conditional offer and settled the speeding outside of a court, it's still a traffic OFFENCE and you should still report it on form. It doen't matter exactly how CONCIVTION means.
And i couldnot see any difference between settling in and outside of a courts for the exact same thing in terms of granting a PR. |
我想问问你的明确理解,请回答Yes or No please.
1. 通过法院被认定的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
2. 通过警察处理的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
|
>>6.1 Do you have any criminal convictions in the UK or any other country >>(including traffic offences) or any civil judgements made against you?
my point's that conviction or not doen't matter if PR application/visa extension's your only concern. You need to put those down on the form anyway regardless it's an offence or a conviction. And i cannot see any difference they handle it.
Abt your question, my ans's NO for both simply coz I WAS TOLD SO by traffic court of manchester magistrate court.
|
http://lkcn.net/eubbs/index.php?showtopic=85142&st=30今天有人说中国驾照无保险驾车被法院判罚过算crimical conviction,这跟我过去的判断是一致的。但不知道中国驾照超速被法院判罚算不算crimical conviction。
我还是那样认为:同样的交通过失,包括无驾照,无保险,超速和闯红灯等,如果是英国驾照,被警察处理过的扣分罚款就不算criminal convictions,被法院处理过的就算criminal convictions。
你现在怎么认为?
greenpepper2
9 Dec 2005, 11:44
my understanding's that not every case of over the speed limit are treated as speeding... if you think M1's the extension of silverstone, you will be categoried as Dangerous Driving, which's as serious as Driving without license/without insurance, which of course entitled you a criminal record.
But speeding, traffic light etc are not as serious as those. So, i think it's not a criminal record even the case go through court. This's verifed by a traffic court.
I don't think otherwise unless you can prove me wrong. The case you mentioned's not.
I don't think this's very important coz a record or not's treated same way if a PR application's your only concern.
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 9 Dec 2005, 11:44) |
my understanding's that not every case of over the speed limit are treated as speeding... if you think M1's the extension of silverstone, you will be categoried as Dangerous Driving, which's as serious as Driving without license/without insurance, which of course entitled you a criminal record.
But speeding, traffic light etc are not as serious as those. So, i think it's not a criminal record even the case go through court. This's verifed by a traffic court.
I don't think otherwise unless you can prove me wrong. The case you mentioned's not.
I don't think this's very important coz a record or not's treated same way if a PR application's your only concern. |
任何事情都有一个量变到质变的过程,犯罪还是不犯罪总有一个界限,这点不重要吗?我现在也不知道超速和闯红灯而被法院处罚的算不算criminal convictions,但是我提到的那个人无保险驾车被法院处罚的算criminal conviction你还有争议吗?他总不会自己的事情,连这点英文都看不懂吧?
老弟,给你一个建议:一般老百姓说的话也要好好听。你过去说被法院判过的traffic offences不算criminal convictions,我认真听了,明确了你的意思,而且暂时认为你对了,没有跟你再争论。这次有人出来说明你的这个界限理解是不对的,我当然也听他的经历,而且我认为他本人没有撒谎和看错。怎么样,你还坚持你的观点吗?
greenpepper2
9 Dec 2005, 14:38
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 9 Dec 2005, 12:12) |
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 9 Dec 2005, 11:44) | my understanding's that not every case of over the speed limit are treated as speeding... if you think M1's the extension of silverstone, you will be categoried as Dangerous Driving, which's as serious as Driving without license/without insurance, which of course entitled you a criminal record.
But speeding, traffic light etc are not as serious as those. So, i think it's not a criminal record even the case go through court. This's verifed by a traffic court.
I don't think otherwise unless you can prove me wrong. The case you mentioned's not.
I don't think this's very important coz a record or not's treated same way if a PR application's your only concern. |
任何事情都有一个量变到质变的过程,犯罪还是不犯罪总有一个界限,这点不重要吗?我现在也不知道超速和闯红灯而被法院处罚的算不算criminal convictions,但是我提到的那个人无保险驾车被法院处罚的算criminal conviction你还有争议吗?他总不会自己的事情,连这点英文都看不懂吧?
老弟,给你一个建议:一般老百姓说的话也要好好听。你过去说被法院判过的traffic offences不算criminal convictions,我认真听了,明确了你的意思,而且暂时认为你对了,没有跟你再争论。这次有人出来说明你的这个界限理解是不对的,我当然也听他的经历,而且我认为他本人没有撒谎和看错。怎么样,你还坚持你的观点吗?
|
bollocks... PLS PLS check my post again... i never argue the fact that person driving without the license should get a criminal record... i think u should enroll in a language school. You have attitute problem and language problem.
If you check my post again, you will see My Post meant some of the cases go thru court are not listed as criminal records, but most would like the guy driving without the license, even the same thing like over the speed limit, there are different treat.
Before you say anything, read my post again and make sure you understand every word of it, use dictionary if you have any problem with it.
Sorry my computer cannot type chinese
greenpepper2
9 Dec 2005, 14:47
Let's make this absolutely clear
My understanding's
1.Driving without license, driving without insurance, dangerous driving (over the speed limit too much for example) ... no choice but have to settle cases on courts... will have a criminal record in most cases
2.speeding, traffic light... you have choice to go to court or settle it outside of courts if you have a UK license... you will not have criminal record whichever way you choose (told by manchester traffic court)... I believe it won't make any difference whichever way you choose in terms of pr application.
I hope this english's plain enough for you to understand
greenpepper2
9 Dec 2005, 15:02
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 9 Dec 2005, 12:12) |
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 9 Dec 2005, 11:44) | my understanding's that not every case of over the speed limit are treated as speeding... if you think M1's the extension of silverstone, you will be categoried as Dangerous Driving, which's as serious as Driving without license/without insurance, which of course entitled you a criminal record.
But speeding, traffic light etc are not as serious as those. So, i think it's not a criminal record even the case go through court. This's verifed by a traffic court.
I don't think otherwise unless you can prove me wrong. The case you mentioned's not.
I don't think this's very important coz a record or not's treated same way if a PR application's your only concern. |
任何事情都有一个量变到质变的过程,犯罪还是不犯罪总有一个界限,这点不重要吗?我现在也不知道超速和闯红灯而被法院处罚的算不算criminal convictions,但是我提到的那个人无保险驾车被法院处罚的算criminal conviction你还有争议吗?他总不会自己的事情,连这点英文都看不懂吧?
老弟,给你一个建议:一般老百姓说的话也要好好听。你过去说被法院判过的traffic offences不算criminal convictions,我认真听了,明确了你的意思,而且暂时认为你对了,没有跟你再争论。这次有人出来说明你的这个界限理解是不对的,我当然也听他的经历,而且我认为他本人没有撒谎和看错。怎么样,你还坚持你的观点吗?
|
任何事情都有一个量变到质变的过程,犯罪还是不犯罪总有一个界限,这点不重要吗?
very important indeed
我现在也不知道超速和闯红灯而被法院处罚的算不算criminal convictions
so shut up
但是我提到的那个人无保险驾车被法院处罚的算criminal conviction你还有争议吗?
I have NEVER argue this whatsoever. In plain english, I AGREE with you
他总不会自己的事情,连这点英文都看不懂吧?
are you saying yourself
老弟,给你一个建议:一般老百姓说的话也要好好听。
of course, i am one of the 老百姓
你过去说被法院判过的traffic offences不算criminal convictions
I never said that... Which sentence make you think i meant that? I said NOT ALL
法院判过的traffic offences算criminal convictions
我认真听了,明确了你的意思,而且暂时认为你对了,没有跟你再争论。
You have every right to argue with me, but you have to take time to read my post carefully. I never said i am absolutely correct. The most powerful reason i believe this way's coz I WAS TOLD SO, but the judge can be wrong as you can see in the post you mentioned.
这次有人出来说明你的这个界限理解是不对的
He DID NOT prove me wrong. I think he got exactly what he deserved. And i agree 100% with you and him on this issue
怎么样,你还坚持你的观点吗?
Yes, i do... but if you can prove me wrong, you are welcome, but don't start with aggresive language.
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:35) |
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:24) | 我想问问你的明确理解,请回答Yes or No please.
1. 通过法院被认定的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
2. 通过警察处理的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions? |
Abt your question, my ans's NO for both simply coz I WAS TOLD SO by traffic court of manchester magistrate court.
|
听你的建议,回去又看了一下你的帖子,我可能有误会你意思的地方,不过你也有回答不清的问题。
请注意我问的问题是traffic offences,包括无驾照/无保险,也包括超速/闯红灯,你是怎么回答的?我是不是应该理解成你认为全部都不算?因为这里先前你也没有说过无驾照/无保险你认为算吧?
如果你要求我在与你争论每个问题前都像读教科书一样精读你的全部字句也行,我承认我没有做到,将来也不可能做到。可能你自己就做到这点了吗?我评论一个人的问题,没有评论一个人语言水平和态度的习惯。两回事!
我还是告诉你一个我的经验,不要轻易相信英国前台人员的一个口头说法。上个月,我给Home Office打电话问一个事情,三个人给了我三个不同的说法,你相信哪一个?
你再看看这个例子,英国专业法官都有对中国驾照一年怎么算理解不如我的时候:
http://lkcn.net/eubbs/index.php?showtopic=91960我中文说明白了吗?
greenpepper2
9 Dec 2005, 15:38
| QUOTE (他乡客 @ 9 Dec 2005, 15:13) |
| QUOTE (greenpepper2 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:35) | | QUOTE (他乡客 @ 27 Nov 2005, 17:24) | 我想问问你的明确理解,请回答Yes or No please.
1. 通过法院被认定的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions?
2. 通过警察处理的traffic offences算不算criminal convictions? |
Abt your question, my ans's NO for both simply coz I WAS TOLD SO by traffic court of manchester magistrate court.
|
听你的建议,回去又看了一下你的帖子,我可能有误会你意思的地方,不过你也有回答不清的问题。 请注意我问的问题是traffic offences,包括无驾照/无保险,也包括超速/闯红灯,你是怎么回答的?我是不是应该理解成你认为全部都不算?因为这里先前你也没有说过无驾照/无保险你认为算吧? 如果你要求我在与你争论每个问题前都像读教科书一样精读你的全部字句也行,我承认我没有做到,将来也不可能做到。可能你自己就做到这点了吗?我评论一个人的问题,没有评论一个人语言水平和态度的习惯。两回事! 我还是告诉你一个我的经验,不要轻易相信英国前台人员的一个口头说法。上个月,我给Home Office打电话问一个事情,三个人给了我三个不同的说法,你相信哪一个? 你再看看这个例子,英国专业法官都有对中国驾照一年怎么算理解不如我的时候: http://lkcn.net/eubbs/index.php?showtopic=91960我中文说明白了吗? |
听你的建议,回去又看了一下你的帖子,我可能有误会你意思的地方,不过你也有回答不清的问题。
Thanks for reading my post again. Sorry about that one, but i think my ans had the context.
请注意我问的问题是traffic offences,包括无驾照/无保险,也包括超速/闯红灯,你是怎么回答的?我是不是应该理解成你认为全部都不算?
again, my ans had context.
因为这里先前你也没有说过无驾照/无保险你认为算吧?
NO, i didn't
如果你要求我在与你争论每个问题前都像读教科书一样精读你的全部字句也行,我承认我没有做到,将来也不可能做到。可能你自己就做到这点了吗?
No, i cannot, but if i want to point out somebody's mistake, i would make sure i read and understand every single word, otherwise i would make fool of myself.
我评论一个人的问题,没有评论一个人语言水平和态度的习惯。两回事!
You did mention something abt the language, which i think it's not necessary. The forum's abt helping each other, that's absolutely no point to be aggressive.
我还是告诉你一个我的经验,不要轻易相信英国前台人员的一个口头说法。上个月,我给Home Office打电话问一个事情,三个人给了我三个不同的说法,你相信哪一个?
100% agree. Even judges can be wrong as proved in another post, but it doens't matter if Pr application's your only concern.
你再看看这个例子,英国专业法官都有对中国驾照一年怎么算理解不如我的时候:
http://lkcn.net/eubbs/index.php?showtopic=91960You have my admiration. You have profound knowledge in this area, you are one of best here.
我中文说明白了吗?
crystal
谢谢你的回帖,我喜欢这样平和理性的争论结局,尽管每次不都是这样。
我还是认为:
法院判过的traffic offences,无论是无驾照/无保险,还是超速/闯红灯等,都算criminal convictions。警察处罚的都不算。
你认为:
法院判过的traffic offences,无驾照/无保险算criminal convictions;超速/闯红灯轻微的等不算criminal convictions。警察处罚的都不算。
下面是我前几天给文学城人在英国写的一个短贴:
政策性的问题,还是多研究多读条文,不要轻易相信电话里等得到回答。
文章来源: XXXX 于 2005-12-07 08:57:01
政策性的问题,还是多研究多读条文,不要轻易相信电话里等得到回答。
本人这些年的一个深深体会,就是英国前台接待人员的素质参差不齐,电话打过去,不同的人都能给出你不同的回答。精英治国的一个并发症,订条文的人不是给接你电话的人。条文太多,每个人不能全部记住。英国人还算爱帮助人,就按照他们当时认为正确的理解给回答了。电话里说的,就是错了也不用付什么责任后果。
好在英国不太搞暗箱操作,条文大都放在明处,遇事就自己多读读条文吧。
条文太多,律师发财的机会也就来了。自己不愿意研究,送钱给律师也行。
这是我们论坛页面的一个简化版本.查看包含更多信息的完整版本请您
点击这里.